Kidman as Springfield? Yikes!
Submitted by debritz on May 2, 2008 - 15:55.
| Please tell me this report is untrue. It says Nicole Kidman is tipped to play Dusty Springfield in a film. When will the movie world wake up to the fact that Ms Kidman is what used to be known as a "leading lady" rather than an actual actor? (Let's face it, the Oscar for The Hours was actually for the prosthetic nose). I say to the producers: Give the role to somebody ballsy who can really belt out a tune - it'll cost you less and you might just have a chance at a smash hit. |  |
Dusty had so much talent.
Dusty had so much talent. Nicole Kidman could not pull this off in a pink fit. She doesn't have the talent ! I wonder if the amazing Tamsin Carroll is available for the role ? She was outstanding in the stage production of "Dusty".
Sadly, Tamsin is not a
I understand that Kidman is
I understand that Kidman is a producer on this film. If she follows the three golden rules of film production....1/ Never use your own money. 2/ Never use your own money. 3/ NEVER USE YOUR OWN MONEY !!!!!!!....she can't lose when the film bombs !
Honestly, Kidman playing an icon like Dusty. It would be like having Bette Davis ( God rest her soul ) playing a teenage Bindi Irwin in a bio-pic about the adorable little Logie nominee !
I think Bette could have
Uh,,, Bette!
Uh,,, Bette!
Post new comment